Manners makith the Man (or Woman)

Young people today are accused of so many thing, mostly negative things. Okay, they are loud, wear daft cloths, listen to odd music very loudly and in general have an air of arrogance that only a young person can have. However, there is nothing wrong with all of that as it is just being a young person and once upon a time we were all like that. The vast majority of these young people are hard working, polite and caring, but of course we very rarely get to hear about them, they are not news and it is very difficult to make political mileage out of the fact that despite having to get over all the problems we old folk put in there way they still manage to turn out well, mostly.
No, if you want to see real ill manners, surliness and general antisocial behaviour you need look no further that old people, especially ones who use free passes on the buses. They seem to think that because they have a free pass it gives them the right to push past other to get on the bus then take up the space that is designated for wheelchairs and pushchairs with their shopping trolleys. The terms "excuse me" or "sorry" never leave their lips and if you don't give way to them and their rude ways they spend the entire time they are on the bus glaring at these "youngsters" who have dared to get in their way.
This is not a cry to get rid of free bus passes. Far from it as I have one myself and very useful it is to. But I am asking my fellow pass holders to start thinking about the world around them and start showing the manners to others that they expect to be shown towards themselves. Actually, thinking about it, it is not only bus pass holders who could adopt some manners, everyone could. There seems to be a notion evolved over the past years that you are not allowed to talk to other people in the street unless they are at the other end of a cell phone. Let me ask you how many times you have been greeted with a cheery "Good Day" as you passed someone on the high street? How many of you say "excuse me" when someone is blocking your passage along the isle of the supermarket, not to mention a "thank you" when they let you pass? Even a simple smile of recognition and a nod of the head would make life more pleasant. Unfortunately, these days you are more likely to be regarded as some kind of nutter if you do this, and if children are involved then the repercussions can be catastrophic.
The world is in a mess and I believe that we could solve a great deal of this if we all came out of our self imposed shells and started to relate to strangers, bringing them into our local society. Being suspicious of strangers on a tribal basis has always been part of human defensive strategy but these days the tribe is global. We can talk to someone in New Zealand as easily as we can speak to someone who lives down the street (and sometimes it is easier to talk to the New Zealander). But with this shrinking of our we have withdrawn into our own shell and stopped talking to real flesh and blood people who we can touch, taste, smell, hear and see. Adopting manners when we meet is a first stage of rebuilding a local community of friends and you never can tell what will develop out of a friendly "good evening" exchanged in the frozen vegetables isle of the supermarket.

Thinking the unthinkable!

As a Green there are a whole range of things that are taken as read, in fact to many to list here, but one of them is climate change and carbon dioxide production. The general Green attitude to this is that it is a bad thing and we must stop, as far as possible, the generation of CO2 . But why? The answer given is that as the CO2 in the atmosphere goes up it forms a kind of blanket that keeps the heat in and so the world heats up and melts the glaciers and makes deserts grow and will kill life on Earth. Absolute rubbish of course but with snippets of the truth woven in. Global warming and/or climate change will not kill life on Earth. Life is a very robust mechanism which can survive from the cold of the Antarctic (-40°C) to the heat of volcanic water pools (+70°C) so it doesn't matter how hot or cold the weather get life will survive, it is just us, humans, and a few other animals, birds and plants who will be killed off. Life will go on and evolution and chaos will take an unsuspecting species of something and give it its turn in the sun.

So here is an idea. Let's use up all the fossil fuels that are on the Earth up as quickly as we can. Bring back gas-guzzlers, coal fired power stations, anything that will destroy fossil fuels because once it has gone it is going to take a very long time (55,000,000 years approximately) to come back. The result of this would be to increase the CO2 in our atmosphere by vast amounts, which will increase global weather instability (it might get hotter or it might get colder we don't really know which.) Many species of plant will thrive in the extra CO2 rich atmosphere, a number of animals will die out but not all of them. As to humans I think that we have evolved into a resourceful species and we will survive as a species. That is not to say that the societies we know today will survive. In fact you can be pretty sure that they wont. We may finish up with a "Green and Pleasant Utopia" where we have learnt out lesson and now live in harmony, but it may not be and I will leave it up to your own imagination as to what human society will be like.

Do I want to live in a future world where the Greenhouse effect has wreaked its havoc on the present ecology of the planet? NO, not really, but then I won't have to. At my age I have only a couple of decades left before I shuffle off this mortal coil. I do not want to leave a legacy to the ones who are coming after me of some of the unthinkable scenarios that slosh around in my imagination. I believe in Humans. I believe that in the past they have done astonishing thing. It is why, when I hear people saying that places such as Stone Henge were built by aliens, I take it as an insult. People like you and me built these monuments using the strength of their muscles and their mind to alter their environments. Climate instability is a product of natural cycles along with human endeavors working in a synergic way to make our world go in a certain direction. I believe that we Humans have the ability to change that direction into something glorious. It won't be easy, epically for us and the next two generations. We will have to make great sacrifices and stop doing some things that give us great pleasure like flying off to Spain at the drop of a hat, but it can be done. We Humans stand on the brink and we could go either way, so we must think the unthinkable and go in the right direction.

I Hate Reading -but I love books!

I hate reading. I hate having to sit there and sort out all those squiggles on a sheet of paper into cohesive information or entertainment. The problem is that the stuff that is contained within the stuff I have to read is fantastic. I just wish that there was another way of accessing it. But there is not so I am stuck with reading. I am sure that there are many people old and young who also hate the mechanics of reading. Probably some of those looking at this now are feeling that I should have not bothered. It is a dilemma that I have never come to terms with because I love writing, I love books, I love the information gleaned, I just hate reading!

So what do you do if you are a kid at school who, like me, hates the process of reading? They are pressured into doing it at all stages of life but really given a good reason for actually doing it. Many of them find the information that the reading will expose to them as boring, irrelevant and of no use to them. What reading opens up to us is quite astonishing when you think about it. There is the whole of literature from the Beano to Pride & Prejudice to Beowulf, but there are other forms of literature that although you don't have to read, someone has to. Plays, poems, movies, TV all depend on someone somewhere reading a script. So no matter what we do we need readers before we can create.

So how do we get people who hate reading to give it a go? I have no idea, after all I am looking for an alternative. I suppose we could go the Graphic Novel route but there are still bits to read. Audio books are an option, but I think that listening to something like "A Brief History of Time" may just be the end of time and space as we know it. I would be fascinated to know the answer to this dilemma - any suggestion?

Better ways to boil water!

In order to generate electricity we boil a kettle of water and push the resulting steam through a turbine. Yes, okay there are slightly different ways of doing it but they still push a gas through a turbine which moves a coil through a magnetic field. But let's think about the kettle and how we get it hot. Burning coal, gas, oil or biomass are the traditional ways with all the associated side junk that they produce. Focusing sunlight with mirrors onto a hot spot is one of the less traditional ways. And there are a whole range of temperature differentiation methods that, in theory at least, could work. And then there is the nuclear option. This uses the immense energy loss when an atom breaks up to boil the water. This is nuclear fission.

Nuclear fission power station were first put on line in the 1950s and almost from the start they began to break down and spread unpleasant things into the environment. The problem with these nuclear power stations was that they were designed to be dirty. They were designed to produce side products from the decay of Uranium atoms which could be used to make very powerful bombs. If this sounds a little improbable consider this. The Iranian government want to develop up a nuclear power industry, so they say. The Americans and Europeans are having seven kinds of fit about this prospect, and why? Because they know that nuclear power stations produce what is needed to produce bombs and if the Iranian's get nuclear bombs they will use them.

There is a call now in Britain to produce "New" nuclear power stations. This would be great if they were actually new, that is the process they use to boil the water was new. The shell of the building will be new but the pile at its heart will be the same old dirty fission device that has changed little since the 1950s. I believe that Nuclear energy could be a good way to produce clean energy - some time in the future that is - not now though. Now we must continue to take a stand against these monstrosities and find better ways of boiling water. Ways that, if the kettle bursts, we can control. The nearest nuclear power station to me is at Hartlepool. Hartlepool may have its detractors but as far as I am concerned it is far preferable to Chernobyl.

Oh, and just don't get me on to fusion power!

Knock, knock, who's there?

How? It is a very simple question but i can almost guarantee that you will not have the answer to it. How is an even more difficult question to answer than Why? At least with why things will have happened that you can safely hang the question on, but How doesn't have that luxury. But I still need to know how! For instance I want to know how the Green Party in Norwich is on the verge of taking over the local council and getting a Green MP while the Green Party in North Tyneside is not even close. I asked a member of the Norwich GP the question of how they did it and his answer was very revealing, "We knocked on doors." he said. "We got out there and made our presence felt. We offered a service, ourselves, and people responded to it." But then that brought up the question of how do you motivate GP members to get out there and start knocking on doors? The answer came "You have someone charismatic and enthusiastic as the figurehead." In Norwich that charismatic figurehead is very close to being elected to parliament.

So how do we of the North Tyneside Green Party get our candidate in the Tynemouth constituency, Julia Erskine, elected to parliament? Well, the door knocking has begun. The glad handing will start to take off and hopefully we will mobilise a lot of people who are not as yet GP members to at least vote of the changes we represent and with luck take up the gauntlet that Political Ecology offers and get the door-knocking habit.

The coming General Election is a good opportunity for us smaller Green Parties to get our face out there and present the new Green Way to people who think we are only going to ban cars and flights and hug trees and bunny rabbets. Political Ecology is a powerful took of social change, for social justice, for fairness, but it is also one hell of a challenge to the status quo and there are many powerful interests that want to make sure the Green future is stamped upon hard. Even the media helps. Of course there are pockets of the media, both traditional and new, that supports the Green future and not just in the meaningless cosmetic way the Grey political parties do. But to much of the mainstream media deride Green initiatives. Just this week in the "Metro" newspaper the Eco-home proposed by an ex- footballer was derided as mad, something from "Tele-tubies Land." If the thought that went into that house was applied to the general run-of-the-mill built housing that is thrown up across the country we would not be worrying about carbon footprints and perhaps the banning of flights(?).

We want lots of people to vote Green at the General Election because Green candidate, and of course Green MP and Local Councilors, will be good not only for England, or the UK but for our whole world because they will all be thinking, and asking,

how!

Trying isn't it!

I have just had a whole weekend of Green Party stuff - and I am tied physically but my mind is teaming with ideas so I can't actually sleep just yet. I met with a fellow Green person from Norwich where in the not to far distant future they are going to have a Green Party council. I mean a real borough council run by Green Party councilors. Amazingly there are other places around the country where there are other Green parties on the brink of taking power. It is good to know that it can happen so why can we not make the breakthrough in North Tyneside? Is there something intrinsically non-green about the place? I don't think so. It has the same mix of people who have the same mix of problems and pleasures as do the good people of Norwich but we do not seem to be able to reach them.

Over the next few months we will be running a campaign to try an get Julia Erskine elected to the job of MP for Tynemouth (we would have liked to have put someone up in Tyneside North but we just don't have the human or cash resources so if you happen to have a spear couple of million under the matres you don't want there is a Green Party that will happily spend it for you.) Tynemouth constituency is a nice seaside area with a little urban depreciation but not much. It is going to be a hotbed of activity politically as the blue-bes think they can take it from the redies while the oranges think that they are going to slip in and grab the prize. There are also a range of Nazi and right wing parties and us, the Green Party. Julia is a very good candidate and would make a very good MP. Unfortunately it would need you lot out there in Tynemouth constituency to vote for her but you wont. That would be to hard. Alot of you will prefer to stick your head in the sand and hope that it will all go away rather than go out and vote - which doesn't help - anybody. If all the good people who normally didn't bother to vote voted for Julia she would be elected.

So Vote for

Julia Erskine

for the Member of Parliament for the Tynemouth Constituency

Who's a teacher now then?

The Conservative Party has proposed that only people with high grade Honers degrees will be allowed to teach in schools. You can tell that these people have never really experienced schools as the majority of us know them or they could never come out with such rubbish. I have met many very intelligent people with a list of degrees as long as your arm who couldn't teach you how to boil water. I also know people who can barely read and write who are brilliant teachers. When I was at school teachers went to teacher training college and left with a teaching certificate. A select few went on to get a B.Ed. but by that time they had served their apprenticeship in a wide range of schools. I was taught by a range of good teachers who were not hogtied by National Curriculum's and league tables. Not only did they teach me the subjects on the time table but they taught us about life-things as well (including how to handle our drink properly).

There is an idea prevalent these days that being educated is about passing exams and gathering together the certificates that go with these passes. The "Gradgrime" factor of "teach 'em facts and nothing but facts" is great if you want to win mastermind but not much use if you need to undertake a project to find thinks out. It doesn't give you research skills, and it is these that we are all going to need in the future whether we are researching in books or on the Internet. Facts are only of use if you know how to find them at put them together in new, innovative ways. Regurgitating the same old stuff will never allow us to progress, or to add to the mass of fact.

But back to the question of who should be "allowed" to teach young people. If I wanted to be a plumber I do not need to be taught by an expert in fluid dynamics but I do need to be taught by someone who can light a blow lamp. A farrier will know as much about the anatomy of a horse as the average zoologist and I know who I would want to show any horse of mine (along with his apprentice).

I suppose we have to expect stupid, unthinking proposals like this from the Conservative Party, it's the sort of idea thing we have come to expect from them. And of course the red and yellow bits of the red-yellow-blue coalition has to come out with their own daft idea so as not to be left behind. Fortunately the is a Political party that is going to be speaking sense throughout the coming month of General Electioneering, and that of course is the Green Party. So, please do yourself and the rest of the world a big favour and vote Green Party where you can at the General Election when it comes.

Vote for

Julia Erskine

Green Party Candidate for the

Tynemouth Constituency

Vote Green Party in 2010

So here we go with the year of (at least one) general election and the Green Party is going to make its great breakthrough, in Brighton. I and the other people in the North Tyneside Green Party will be concentrating on getting Julia Erskine elected as MP for the Tynemouth constituency. It is going to be difficult but it will work, eventually. Julia is a very good candidate and when elected will represent East North Tyneside (and hopefully west North Tyneside when she has time) very well. But it can only happen if people vote for her or any other Green Party candidate for that matter. There is a common mantra we here when we knock on peoples doors. It goes "we would vote for you if we thought you had any chance of getting elected." People don't seem to see the illogic of this comment and yet I have heard it year after year when knocking on peoples door. It is almost as common as the comment "I fought in the war for this country and now look at it. I'm going to vote BNP/NF." How people could have fought and died to prevent fascism taking hold then vote for the same bunch but in modern suits I don't know.
Voting Green Party is not a waste of your vote. It is a very positive action. But it is important to vote Green Party and not be dazzled by the cosmetic greenness that other political parties are going to try and fool you into believing in. Have no doubt the Red-Blue-Yellow party who clam not only to be a separate entity but also "green" are not, either. Unless a party is proposing a non-growth economic policy as a way to solve the present problems of the world then they are not green.
So, in May (or if the General election is in March then in March and May) vote for your Green Party Candidate. This is your chance to change the world.
Please take it.

Service - what's that?

Our parliamentary representatives are in the news again due to their demands for money rather than for the service they are doing for us the subjects of this kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Our Members of Parliament (MPs) as well as our MEPs, MSPs and various other so called leaders of our society actually get paid a great deal of money. Certainly a great deal more than they themselves have designated that we the common people need to live on. The minimum wage for someone in their mid 20s is £5-80 an hour, that is £208-80 on a 26 hour week or £10,857-60 in a 52 week year (and that is before tax). Remember, this is the amount of money per anum that the MPs at Westminster have decreed is what a normal person requires to live on in the United Kingdom at the beginning of the twenty first century. And yet these self same MPs are complaining that they cannot live on a salary that is at least eight times more than this plus all the allowances and perks that they get. They are telling us that if they got more pay they wouldn't have to indulge in corrupt practices which a lot, but not all, have been doing.
We are told (usually by MPs) that MPs should be paid a high wage in order to attract good people into the role of MPs and that many of them are taking a cut in wages when they enter parliament. This argument makes me spit blood. I was always taught that the primary function of MPs is to serve the needs of the people they represent, not to make money on the back of it. But this concept of service seems to have been forgotten in relation to the governance of our country. When the Queen elects our next Prim Minister (and remember please that she is the only person who can elect HER Prim Minister) she will not take the amount of cash involved into consideration (I hope). That doesn't mean he won't be paid a very large wedge of money for the privilege of serving the Crown in this manor.
What I believe is that all elected public servants should be paid minimum wage based on a 40 hour week (they can work longer if necessary). They would need to be allowances for secretaries, researchers and the like but these should be set scales administered by a personnel department at Westminster. I am sure that it is not beyond the wit of man to sort out a system that allows people that have a true calling to serve the subjects of the United Kingdom as their MPs to do so efficiently and honestly. We should aim to get those people who are in parliament for the money out as soon as possible replacing them with those who wish to serve. I also think it could be good to have a limit to the number of parliaments any individual can serve in but this will need a bit more consideration.

That Most Futile Prejudice.

There is, on this planet anyway, only one species of human, Homo sapien sapiens. This species of human can be found in every nook and cranny of the planet from its hottest and coldest deserts to its wettest forests. One species but many races of that species. Archaeology tells us that the human species evolved first on the continent of Africa some three million years ago, quite recently in evolutionary terms. For the first two thirds of that 3 million years humans lived exclusively on and arround the African continent and in that two million years numerous geneticly diverce types evolved. Even today the genetic mix in Africa is more diverse that the genetic mix in all the rest of the world put together. This human genetic inheritance was influenced by the environment in which these humans found themselves. This is called selection pressure. The genetic makeup that is best fitted to an environment will be selected for as the holder of those genes pass them on to more offspring who survive better. This is what caused racial diversity. It produced the small, stocky, jungle dwelling Baka and the tall, slender, plains dwelling Maasai. When humans finally left Africa about 30,000 years ago, and began to occupy other more extreme environments their adaptability allowed them to evolve new racial types. Those humans who moved into the ice covered northlands needed to absorb what little sun there was around up there so their offspring who had lower levels of melanin in their skin and hair began to be selected for as they had an advantage over their darker skinned relatives (this is only one traite that was affected by the new environment.). The lighter skin of the Caucasian and the Mongol races developed in their own directions, and as the ice retreated so the opportunities for expansion were taken by the various races. Eventually humans abandoned their nomadic way of life and began to stay in one place to grow food. Because they were no longer moving en-mass the racial types that had evolved began to stabilise in particular geographical areas and the mixing of racial types began to slow. Tradition meant that you only mated within a limited geographically imposed genetic pool which enhanced the racial difference. Demands for land may have exacerbated the suspicion of the racial group over the hill, but it must be recognised that although racial difference became pronounced we remained one single species of Homo sapien sapiens.

Eight thousand or so (or should that be 3 million) years later we live in very different times. We have become migratory once again. Many of us will not die in the same place we were born. The different races of humans are no longer bounded by the geography of the planet. Our mass transport systems have overcome the most imposing of geographical barriers. We either fly over them or dig holes under them. Because of this the racial differences that developed no longer have any relevance. Caucasians can be found in every continent as can Mongols and Africans. There is an increasing incidence of interbreeding between the human races and the mixing of the various gene pools is producing a whole new, better group of humans. Indeed, as we get to the end of the first decade of the twenty first century of the common era the most futile ism is racism. The idea that one race of humans were superior to any other race of humans has always been a political concept rather than anything based in fact. It gave the race that decided that it was superior, (often white Europeans, but Orientals, Asians and Africans have also held these views) the excuse to exploit the apparently lesser races "for its own benefit." Of course those who really benefit are the "superior race" while the "inferior race" had their culture, which showed just how inferior they were, systematically destroyed and placed into museums to demonstrate how the white folk evolved to their superior status.

The destruction of the "inferior" cultures have had now come back to bite the "superior" cultures. Now that our western European model of culture has been accepted as the norm all across the planet and amongst every culture of humans (to a greater or lesser extent) the members of the so called inferior culture are doing exactly what the "superior" races said that they wanted the "inferior" races to do and taking on the superior culture. Indeed, not only taking it on but taking it over. People from the so called inferior races have taken on the challenge and have shown themselves to be equal, if not better at it than their so called superiors. Because of this some members of so called superior races have revived all the old tosh about superiority and inferiority along with the idea that these savages are going to rampage across our land rapping (white women of course, women of other races are fair game and get no better than they deserve!!!) and pillaging as they go.

The sooner we understand that racism is the most futile of emotions that bear no fruit in our modern society the sooner we can get on with evolving into a species that will cope with all the problems that face humans all across the globe. By mixing our gene pools we will be in a far better position to deal with the challenge of global warming and the like. Until we accept that we are one species under the sun and we need as many options in our gene pool as possible rather than limiting it to a narrow band of possibilities, our survival on this planet is questionable. We would not be the first species from this planet to go extinct. It has happened numerous time in the past and will continue to happen in the future. Our species has come a long way in the last two million years but if we limit our options just for vainglorious political reasons we won't have another two million years. We might not have another two thousand years!

Fascist political parties such as the BNP and NF build their policies on the concept of the separation of the races and superiority of white races. They wrap themselves in Union Flags and cymbals of Britishness most of which have names derived from "foreign" languages (Britain, for instance, comes from the Latin Britannica.) If we give these people the credence of voting them into positions of power you will be helping to destroy any hope that the human species has of surviving into the future. Their narrow minded attitude to racial mixing will not preserve but destroy our culture. Indeed, it will go a long way to the destruction of out species which will run out of vigour due to in breading and die out. Embrace the world.

Valdelavilla - Pueblo Inglés

My word doesn't time fly when you are having fun? I can't believe that it has been so long since last I did something with this blog. Anyway, I am back and at it and as the winter nights draw in I am sure I will be at it often.

A couple of times a year I go on a really astonishing get together in Spain where I spend the week talking to the most amazing people, and all in English. At the end of August I went on my eighth programme with Pueblo Inglés or English Town to Valdelavilla, a village that was turned into a hotel in the Saroia area of Spain. It is remote and beautiful and - wait for it - FREE. Yes, it doesn't cost a penny (unless you want to drink at the bar). Food wine and accommodation is provided to us Anglos (the term used for the native English speakers). All you have to do is get yourself to Madrid (which you have to pay for) and a bus pick up point.
So what do we do once on the bus? Well there are some twenty Anglos and twenty Spaniards and we have to speak to each other - however Spanish is BAND! We are all of us only allowed to speak English. The idea is that the Spaniards will have a reasonably good standard of English but lack the opportunity to practice it in a continuous way. At Pueblo Englés they get nothing else but English. So it is a total immersion experience. The main exercise is the "1 to1" which is one Anglo sitting, or walking, sometimes even swimming, with a Spaniard and talking to each other. What about? Well pretty much anything really. The important thing is to talk. I have had chats about quantum physics, bread making, the endocrine system, ham curing, theatre, both medical and the drama and loads else beside. There are also little entertainment and group sessions to work with so there is always something happening. By the end of the week you will be physically exhausted but mentally fizzing with ideas. Oh, yes, the people. Well the Anglos come from all over the English speaking world Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Ireland, UK, West Indies, India - as long as you have a high standard of spoken English you are welcome, and if you have a good accent like Geordie or Scows or Welsh or Scots then that is even better.
As for the Spaniards they come from every walk of life sucu as top exscutives, students, scientis, housewives, al with a desire or need to improve their English.

Look, give it a try and you will certainly have an experience. There are two companies that run programmes which are essentially the same as they were once the same company. Their web sites are at:

http://www.puebloingles.com/

&

http://www.vaughantown.com/

And did I mention the Rioja?

Playing Marbles

Two hundred odd years ago the British Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire in Greece took charge of (nicked?) a whole load of marble statuary that adorned a sacred place and brought them to London where he sold them off to the British Government who put them in the new fangled British Museum. The Ambassador was Lord Elgin, the sacred place was the Temple of Athena on the Acropolis in Athens and the statues are now called the Elgin Marbles. And the question is should they be in London or Athens. The Athenians have just built a brand new museum to house the relics that have survived from the Parthenon and the Acropolis in general, but of course they only have copies of the Parthenon Marbles, as we should refer to these sculptures, to display and they want the originals back.

What Elgin did was no different to what a lot of rich Christians did all across the world. At the time Great Britain was one of the most powerful countries in the world and its Empire was growing. The Ottoman Empire was powerful but it was Muslim and as such did not have the same attitude towards historic monuments that the Christians had so to them the pagan temples and statuary that littered the lands of their empire was just so much stone and very un-Islamic. This is also true of vast swaves of Africa half of which was Muslim and the other half regarded as simple savages with no appreciation of the fine things their culture produced. It was far better that these works of craftsmanship and high art be housed in the great museums of London, Berlin, Paris, Madrid and New York to name but a few so that civilised people could appreciate them.

And now savages, pagans and various non-western cultures want the stuff we pillaged back. And not only the artifacts that we took charge of, they want the bones of their ancestors back as well. Far to many museums have become the mausoleums for remains of people from all over the world, including their own country. Some of these remains have great importance to the cultures they were taken from. Worship of ancestors is very important and even in the cultures of the "Peoples of the Book" (Jews, Christians & Muslims) bodily remains are of great importance to the future of the soul of that person.

We have at our disposal a great range of modern technology that can make almost perfect copies of things and, to quote Terry Pratchett's Granny Wetherwax "Things that look like thing are often more like things than things!" As such we should be making exact copies of all the artifacts (things) we have taken charge off and then return the originals to their home place with an agreement that the original must be made available for examination by researchers. Those parts of the world that do not have suitable display spaces should be helped by an international body to get something built and properly staffed. And it is not only the United Kingdom that should be doing this. It seems to me that this could be something useful that the EU could be doing as most of the great Modern Empire s are represented within it - even Turkey and the Ottoman Empire will be in soon.

The human remains that we have are a different matter. They need to be returned to as close to the place they were found and re-interred using the rights of the culture from which they came as closely as possible. That means not giving pagan remains a christian burial right.

These Artifacts and human remains are to important to simply play a game of political marbles with. They matter to people and in many cases have done for a very long time.

Whoes a Stranger?

I was listening to the radio this morning and they did a bit about the Speaker of the Commons. During its progress it reminded us that we, the people who elect MPs and pay their wages via our taxes are referred to as Strangers and treated with all the contempt that can be mastered with the use of that word. So why should we be strangers in the house of commons? These people, including all the support staff, are our employees. They are supposed to be there to serve the needs of the people of the United Kingdom and yet the people of the United Kingdom are officially Strangers in their own Parliament. It is this attitude that has lead to the recent debacle of MPs allowances. Because we are regarded as Strangers they think that can do what they like without consequences. There is a great deal of talk about reform of Parliament. Proposed changes to everything from Allowances and expenses to a complete revamp of the voting system. But until "We the People" are regarded as friends within the Palace of Westminster instead of being Strangers the old aloof attitudes will prevail and our representatives, our employees, will continue to find ways of milking the system. Parliament does need certain "Privileges" in order to work properly. For instance the naming of miscreants that could not be done in the open forum of life. But these privileges are few and far between and they should all be listed for public scrutiny. If we don't place Parliament and our representatives who work there into the hands of the people who pay for it all then those people will continue loosing faith in the system and it will fall more and more into the hands of the extreme minorities, left or right wing. The question is how do we, the ordinary member of the public, make sure we get our hands on the power to keep parliament on the straight and narrow. We must take an interest in what is going on at Westminster. We must contact our MP regularly with our thoughts and suggestions along with a demand to justify themselves in what they are doing. If one or two people do this they will be regarded as cranks, but if one or two hundred people do it regularly then it will become something of importance. And if every one of there constitutes got in touch at least once a year it would really get them thinking. Try it, all you have to do put your MPs name, their constituency, The Palace of Westminster, London on an envelope then use it to send your comments in. Have fun.

Done and dusted - till the next time!

So the votes were counted and I did not become Mayor of North Tyneside. I did achieve most of the objectives I set out to. I got some 5000 1st. and 2nd. preference votes. The membership of North Tyneside Green Party has doubled, old, dormant members have revived their interest in Political Ecology and we are starting to get through to people. I am saddened by the fact that so many people in North Tyneside voted for Fascists as a protest (I know it was a protest vote as a large number of people whose 1st pre. vote was for me gave their 2nd pref to a Nazi and I picked up a large number of 2nd pref. voted from fascist 1st prefs.)
The Green party has a great deal to do although we have done a good job of germinating a good crop of seeds across North Tyneside. Now they need to be nurtured. Brought into the light. Shown tender loving care so that when a Green candidate stands as Elected Mayor in 2013 we will be up there as contenders. You can still join us in the work we will be doing within the communities of North Tyneside. Go to our web page which you will find on the links column next to this blog to see what we are doing. Every one's ideas and contributions are welcome. And if anyone just happens to have a spear couple of grand stuffed into a matrices they don't use then North Tyneside Green Party will be happy to put it to good use, because at the moment we are skint.
So, here we go for the Council elections next May

ya-hooooooooooo!